The new year has begun, and I’ve already completed a 9 million contribution.
It included some principles I hadn’t added in a while, and hitting the buy button again genuinely made me excited. Just thinking about putting more money in next month already puts me in a good mood.
Over the past month, the KOSPI has risen by more than 1,000 points. I hold some Korean stocks, and the returns have jumped so suddenly that I’m honestly unsure what to do.
I never imagined that my original commitment to index investing would be tested because of the Korean market. So I took a step back and calmed the excitement, thinking things through slowly. “This too shall pass,” I reminded myself, and decided to stay on my own path.
Each time temptation shows up like this, if I manage it wisely, perhaps my conviction will only grow stronger.
This year, I had a lot of cash expenses because of wedding preparations, so I was only able to invest around 26 million KRW. It’s a bit disappointing, but once everything related to the wedding is fully wrapped up and the remaining expenses are settled, I’ll get back to investing diligently again.
As of December 2024, my portfolio reached about 180.8 million KRW, which means it grew by roughly 60 million KRW this year.
I’ve been posting updates on my three-tier/layer personal pension portfolio every year, and again I plan share the plan for the new year soon as well.
ISA 계좌가 3년 만기가 되어 연금저축계좌로 이관하고 세액공제를 받을 준비를 하고 있었다. 그런데 문득 “미국 세금보고에도 영향이 있지 않을까?” 하는 생각이 들어 확인해보았다.
💡 결론
미국 거주자는 한국에서 비과세나 과세이연 혜택이 있는 계좌(ISA, 연금저축 등) 내에서 발생한 양도소득도 모두 미국에서 과세 대상이 된다.
📌 상황 요약
한국과 미국 모두에 세금 보고를 하고 있음
ISA 계좌가 3년 만기가 되어 세액공제 혜택 받기 위해 연금저축계좌로 이관 검토
참고로 이관 시 ISA 내 종목을 모두 매도(현금화)해야 함
이 매도차익이 미국 세법상 과세되는지 확인 필요
구글과 네이버를 아무리 찾아봐도 명확한 답이 없어, 결국 GPT에 질문하고 공식 세법 근거(IRS Code, Regulations, Publication)를 요청해 교차 검증했다.정리하면 다음과 같다.
🇰🇷 한국 세법 vs 🇺🇸 미국 세법의 충돌
한국의 ISA·연금저축은 세금이 이연되거나 비과세되지만, 미국 세법은 “전 세계 소득 과세” 원칙을 따르기 때문에 계좌 구조가 세법상 인정되지 않으면 그대로 과세 대상이 된다.
1. ISA는 미국 세법상 ‘비과세 계좌’로 인정되지 않음
ISA는 한국에서 세금이 이연되지만, 미국에서는 단순한 일반 투자계좌(brokerage account) 로 간주된다.
따라서 ISA 내에서 발생한 이자·배당·매도차익은 미국 세법상 발생 시점에 과세된다. (한국에서 비과세라도 미국에서는 과세됨)
2. ISA 만기 매도는 미국 세법상 과세 이벤트
ISA 내 자산을 매도하면 미국 세법상 실제 매도(Gain realization) 로 본다.
매도차익이 있다면 해당 연도 Form 1040 / Schedule D에 신고해야 한다.
한국에서는 단순 이관으로 간주되어 과세가 없지만, 미국에서는 매도이익이 실현된 것으로 본다.
3. 연금저축계좌로의 이관은 Rollover로 인정되지 않음
미국 세법상 Qualified Retirement Account (예: IRA, 401(k)) 로 인정되지 않기 때문에 세금 없는 rollover로 처리 불가하다.
단순히 새로운 투자로 현금을 넣은 것으로 간주된다.
즉, 이전 시점의 매도이익은 이미 realized income 으로 과세된다.
비교 요약
항목
한국 세법상
미국 세법상
ISA 내 매도
비과세 (200~400만원)
모두 과세 (capital gain realization)
연금저축으로 이관
세금이연
단순 투자 (과세 없음, 단 매도차익은 과세)
세액공제 혜택
O
X
미국 세법상 세제혜택 계좌 근거
미국 세법(IRC)은 특정한 계좌만 세제혜택 계좌(tax-favored account) 로 인정한다.
계좌
세법 조항
요약
Traditional IRA
IRC §408(a)
불입 시 공제, 인출 시 과세
Roth IRA
IRC §408A
인출 시 비과세
401(k) / 403(b)
IRC §401(k), §403(b)
고용주 제공 퇴직계좌
HSA
IRC §223
의료목적 시 불입·운용·인출 모두 비과세
ESA
IRC §530
교육비용용 저축 계좌
참고 문서
IRS Publication 590-A / 590-B
IRC §408, §408A, §401(k)
IRS Publication 969
Rollover 정의 (미국 세법상 근거)
Qualified plan 간 이전만 인정되며, 그 외는 세금 없는 이관 불가.
요건
내용
Qualified Account 간 이전
양쪽 모두 §401, §403, §408 등에서 정의된 계좌
60일 규칙
수령 후 60일 내 재입금
1년 1회 제한
IRA 간 rollover는 연 1회
비인정 예
일반 계좌, 해외계좌 → IRA 이전
⚖️ 정리
구분
한국 ISA / 연금저축
미국 Qualified Plan
세법 근거
한국 소득세법 제91조
IRC §401, §403, §408 등
세금 이연 인정
O
X
Rollover 인정
O (ISA→연금저축)
X
미국 내 과세
매도 시 과세
요건 충족 시 비과세
여기서 또 다른 궁금증이 든다. 미국 세법상 비과세 (또는 세금이연) 계좌의 정의와 rollover 기준은 positive list 정책으로 (이런 계좌만 해당됨) 이해하면 되는것인가? 추가 질의를 GPT에 문의 하였고 그렇다는 답변이다.
미국 세법은 “과세주의(taxable by default)” 구조다.
“모든 소득은 과세된다 (unless expressly excluded by law).”
– Gross income means all income from whatever source derived. – IRC §61(a)
즉, 세법에 명시적으로 예외 조항이 있어야만 비과세나 이연이 가능하다. 따라서 “이런 계좌만 인정된다”는 positive list system으로 운영된다.
계좌
세법 조항
혜택
비고
401(k)
IRC §401(k)
V
명시적 세금이연
IRA
IRC §408
V
세금공제/이연
Roth IRA
IRC §408A
V
인출 시 비과세
HSA
IRC §223
V
의료용 비과세
한국 ISA / 연금저축
미국 세법상 언급 없음
X
일반 과세
이관 시점 당시 ISA 납입금 3,000만원에 수익이 1,500만원이여서 한국 세액공제는 약 300만원, 미국 과세는 (long-term 15%) 약 225만원 정도다. 세액공제를 받아도 (+) 이기는 하나, 서류작업과 복잡한 보고 절차를 감안하면 미국 거주 중에는 ISA를 그대로 보유하는 게 현실적인 선택일 듯하다.
미국 이주 전 일반 위탁계좌의 매매는 모두 정리하고 장기투자 중심으로 재편했는데, 이제는 한국의 과세이연 계좌조차 미국에선 과세된다는 점이 오히려 장기투자 동기를 더 확실히 만들어준다ㅠ
My retirement savings account has now reached a cumulative return of 94.6%. It’ll probably drop a bit if I keep contributing, but I’m not complaining. For now, I even raised the left-side axis on the graph from 100% to 150%.
My ISA account reached its 3-year mark in October. I planned to close it, transfer the funds into my retirement savings account, and get the tax deduction — but unfortunately, that didn’t work out.
When selling and cashing out the ISA investments, I would have had to pay U.S. taxes on the capital gains… I wrote a separate post explaining the details.
It’s a bit disappointing, but it looks like I’ll have to keep the ISA account running indefinitely. Maybe after some time, they’ll eventually raise the contribution limit to 200 million KRW.
My ISA account finally hit the 3-year maturity mark, and I was getting ready to transfer it into my retirement savings account to claim a tax deduction. But suddenly, a thought crossed my mind: “Wait… wouldn’t this affect my U.S. tax return?” So I decided to double-check.
💡 Conclusion
If you live in the U.S., all capital gains generated inside Korean tax-advantaged accounts (ISA, retirement pension accounts, etc.) are still taxable in the U.S., even if they are tax-free or tax-deferred in Korea.
📌 Situation Summary
I file taxes in both Korea and the U.S.
My ISA account reached the 3-year maturity, and I considered transferring it to a retirement savings account to get the Korean tax deduction.
But when transferring, all assets inside the ISA must be sold (converted to cash).
I needed to check whether this capital gain would be taxable under U.S. tax law.
After digging through Google and Naver without finding a clear answer, I eventually asked GPT and requested official sources (IRS Code, Regulations, Publications) to cross-verify. Here’s the summary.
🇰🇷 Korean Tax Law vs. 🇺🇸 U.S. Tax Law
Korea treats ISA and retirement accounts as tax-free or tax-advantage. But the U.S., following its worldwide taxation rules, only recognizes accounts listed in U.S. law. If the account structure isn’t recognized, any gains are simply taxable.
1. ISA is not recognized as a tax-favored account under U.S. law
Although ISA gains are tax-advantaged (or tax-free) in Korea, the U.S. views it as just a regular brokerage account. So interest, dividends, and capital gains generated inside an ISA are taxable when realized, regardless of Korean treatment.
2. Selling within ISA at maturity is a taxable event under U.S. law
When ISA assets are sold at maturity, the U.S. considers that a realization of capital gains. If a gain exists, it must be reported on Form 1040 / Schedule D for that year.
Korea may treat this as a simple transfer with no tax, but the U.S. treats it as realized income.
3. Transferring to a retirement savings account is not a rollover
Because Korean retirement accounts are not recognized as Qualified Retirement Accounts under U.S. tax law, the transfer cannot be treated as a tax-free rollover.
The cash that enters the new Korean retirement account is simply considered a new investment. Any prior gains must already be recognized as taxable income.
Summary Table
ISA Treatment
Item
Korea
U.S.
Selling within ISA
Tax-free (up to 2–4M KRW)
Fully taxable (capital gain realization)
Transfer to retirement account
Tax-deferred
Treated as new investment (sale still taxable)
Tax deduction benefits
O
X
U.S. Tax-Favored Accounts (Legal Basis)
U.S. tax law (IRC) recognizes only a specific list of tax-advantaged accounts:
Account
Legal Basis
Summary
Traditional IRA
IRC §408(a)
Deductible contributions, taxable withdrawals
Roth IRA
IRC §408A
Tax-free withdrawals
401(k) / 403(b)
IRC §401(k), §403(b)
Employer-sponsored retirement plans
HSA
IRC §223
Tax-free contributions, growth, withdrawals for medical use
Only rollovers between qualified accounts are tax-free.
Requirement
Description
Qualified-to-Qualified transfer
Both accounts must be listed under §401, §403, §408, etc.
60-day rule
Funds must be redeposited within 60 days
1-year rule
IRA-to-IRA rollover permitted once per year
Not permitted
Transfers from general accounts or foreign accounts
Final Comparison
Category
Korean ISA / Retirement
U.S. Qualified Plan
Legal basis
Korean Income Tax Act §91
IRC §401, §403, §408
Tax deferral recognized
O
X
Rollover recognized
O (ISA→retirement)
X
U.S. taxation
Taxable on sale
Tax-free if requirements met
At this point, another question naturally came up: Is the U.S. system essentially a “positive list”? Meaning: Only the accounts explicitly listed receive tax benefits.
GPT confirmed that this is correct.
U.S. Tax Principle: Taxable by Default
U.S. tax law operates on a “tax unless excluded” basis:
“All income is taxable unless expressly excluded by law.” — IRC §61(a)
So only accounts explicitly listed in the law qualify for tax-free or tax-deferred treatment. Everything else — including Korean ISA and retirement accounts — is treated as a regular taxable account.
Account
Code
Benefit
Status
401(k)
IRC §401(k)
Tax-deferred
✔ Recognized
IRA
IRC §408
Deduction/deferral
✔ Recognized
Roth IRA
IRC §408A
Tax-free withdrawal
✔ Recognized
HSA
IRC §223
Full tax-free status
✔ Recognized
Korean ISA / Pension
—
None
✘ Not recognized
My Case
At the time of transfer:
ISA contributions: 30M KRW
Gains inside ISA: 15M KRW
Korean tax benefit: ~3M KRW
U.S. long-term capital gains tax (15%): ~2.25M KRW
Even though the Korean tax benefit is larger, the paperwork and complexity make the transfer unattractive. Realistically, I’ll just maintain the ISA while living in the U.S.
Before moving abroad, I had already liquidated all my regular Korean brokerage holdings and shifted everything into long-term investments. But now that even Korean tax-deferred accounts are taxable under U.S. law, this actually motivates me to stick with long-term investing even more… 😭
Thankfully, I managed to pass all sections on the first try without failing any of them.
Passing the exam doesn’t instantly change my life, of course, but having taken on the challenge and succeeded definitely feels good.
I shared the news with my family and close friends, and they all congratulated me warmly.
I’m heading to Korea for a short trip this week, so I’m planning to treat myself to lots of good food.
And when I have some time, I want to gather my thoughts—what I felt while preparing for the exam and what I reflected on afterward—and turn it into a proper post.
I only had about 6 to 7 weeks to study, so my preparation wasn’t sufficient. In particular, the Business Law (BL) section was completely new to me, and I didn’t have enough time to study it. Toward the later part of my study period, I realized I couldn’t cover everything, so I decided to focus on the Tax section instead. For BL, I skipped most of the lectures and studied mainly through practice questions and memorization, aiming not to miss any conceptual questions. It wasn’t easy, but I have no regrets.
In the REG MCQ (Testlet 1 & 2) section, about 75% of the questions were on Tax and 25% on BL. I was hoping BL would be less than 15%, but since it wasn’t, I spent my remaining time carefully checking how much BL appeared and focused intensely on the Tax questions. The Tax topics seemed well-balanced overall, and as expected, all the SIM questions were related to Tax.
The MCQs were manageable (except for BL, of course), but the SIMs were quite different from the ones in Becker, which threw me off a bit. Knowing the concepts was enough to solve them, but expecting Becker-style problems was a mistake.
Since Tax is closely related to real life, I actually enjoyed studying it.
The results are coming out in about three weeks. Hopefully, I’ll be able to write a follow-up post about passing and share my overall study reflections then.
It feels like I’ve finally crossed about 90% of the CPA mountain.
My girlfriend said she couldn’t see any of the typical traits of someone who studies well in me — and honestly wondered if I’d ever pass studying the way I do. She says it’s kind of a miracle that I actually made it. To be honest, that comment annoyed me a bit — which, in the end, pushed me to work even harder during the last stretch.
For the final section, Regulation, I only had about 6–7 weeks to prepare. I wasn’t sure if that would be enough, but I decided to give it everything I had and pass it in one shot.
When I first started this journey, it felt like a long, dark tunnel — and now that there’s just one subject left, it feels surreal. Can’t wait to finish and finally relax.